TECHNICAL COMPARISON

VTA vs Bitcoin

A source-aware comparison of protocol design. VTA protocol details below are taken from the uploaded VirtaCoin technical paper dated December 14, 2015. Current local-node measurements are shown separately and are not treated as network-wide measurements.
VTA · DOCUMENTED DESIGN

Virtacoin

Proof of workScrypt-based PoW
Target block interval60 seconds, according to the 2015 paper
Difficulty adjustmentRetargeted every block, according to the paper
Maximum supply20,999,999,999.9769 VTA stated in the paper
Wallet lineageVirtacoin Core described as based on the Bitcoin wallet
BTC · PAPER REFERENCE

Bitcoin

Proof of workDouble-SHA-256 PoW is described as Bitcoin's mechanism in the VTA paper
Target block intervalAbout 10 minutes in the Bitcoin design
Difficulty adjustmentVTA paper contrasts Bitcoin/Litecoin's 2016-block retarget with VTA's per-block approach
Maximum supply21 million BTC in the referenced Bitcoin design
ArchitectureBitcoin's proof-of-work chain is the design VTA states it derives from

Side-by-Side Technical Matrix

DimensionVirtacoin (VTA)Bitcoin (BTC)Evidence type
PoW algorithmScryptDouble-SHA-2562015 VTA paper
Nominal block target60 seconds~10 minutesProtocol design reference
Difficulty retargetEvery block2016-block period in the VTA paper's comparison2015 VTA paper
Maximum supply20,999,999,999.976921,000,000Historical design figures
Security modelProof of work + ScryptProof of work + SHA-256Protocol design
Current network heightNot independently verified network-wideNot populated on this pageCurrent measurement separate

Current Local VTA Snapshot

LOCAL NODE
2,438,866
Block height received from the configured VTA Core bridge.
LOCAL NODE
10.50183189
Difficulty received from the configured VTA Core bridge.
Timestamp: 2026-09-19 04:50:28 · These values describe the connected local node snapshot, not necessarily the current state of the entire network.

Interpretation Rules

What can be compared directly?Documented protocol parameters such as PoW algorithm, target interval, and stated retarget method.
What needs fresh measurements?Actual confirmation time, current fees, current network hash rate, mining concentration, current chain height, and current network-wide difficulty.
What is not claimed?This page does not assign a winner, score, security ranking, or payment-suitability verdict.
Source note: VTA protocol descriptions are derived from the uploaded “VirtaCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with proof-of-work and Scrypt algorithm” paper by Debasish Banerjee, dated December 14, 2015. The paper itself describes its Bitcoin comparison and historical design parameters. Current VTA measurements shown here come from the site's local VTA Core bridge.